翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Critics' Choice Movie Award for Best Young Performer ・ Critics' Choice Movie Awards ・ Critics' Choice Television Award ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Actor in a Comedy Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Actor in a Drama Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Actor in a Movie/Miniseries ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Actress in a Comedy Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Actress in a Drama Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Actress in a Movie/Miniseries ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Animated Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Comedy Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Drama Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Guest Performer in a Comedy Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Guest Performer in a Drama Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Movie/Miniseries ・ Criticism of Esperanto ・ Criticism of ESPN ・ Criticism of evolutionary psychology ・ Criticism of Facebook ・ Criticism of Family Guy ・ Criticism of fast food ・ Criticism of Franklin D. Roosevelt ・ Criticism of Google ・ Criticism of government ・ Criticism of government response to Hurricane Katrina ・ Criticism of Greenpeace ・ Criticism of Hadith ・ Criticism of Haredi Judaism ・ Criticism of Hinduism ・ Criticism of Holocaust denial Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Criticism of Esperanto ： ウィキペディア英語版 Criticism of Esperanto Esperanto was conceived as a language of international communication, more precisely as a universal second language. Since publication, there has been debate over whether it is possible for Esperanto to attain this position, and whether it would be an improvement for international communication if it did. ==Common objections== There have been numerous objections to Esperanto over the years. For example, there have been criticism that Esperanto is not neutral enough, but also that it should convey a specific culture, which would make it less neutral; that Esperanto does not draw on a wide enough selection of the world's languages, but also that it should be more narrowly Western European. ===Lack of neutrality=== Esperantists often argue for Esperanto as a culturally neutral means of communication. However, it is often accused of being Eurocentric. This is most often noted in regard to the vocabulary, but applies equally to the orthography, phonology, and semantics, all of which are thoroughly European. The vocabulary, for example, is about two-thirds Romance and one-third Germanic; the syntax is Romance; and the phonology and semantics are Slavic. The grammar is arguably more European than not, but Claude Piron among others argues that the derivation system is not particularly European, though the inflection is.〔''Le Defi des Langues'' by Claude Piron. Harmattan, 1994.〕 Critics argue that a truly neutral language would draw its vocabulary from a much wider variety of languages, so as not to give unfair advantage to speakers of any of them. Although a truly representative sampling of the world's thousands of languages would be unworkable, a derivation from, say, the Romance, Semitic, Indic, Bantu, and Sino-Tibetan language families would strike many as being fairer than Esperanto-like solutions, as these families cover about 60% of the world's population, compared to a quarter for Romance and Germanic. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Criticism of Esperanto」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.